Evaluation Process

The Journal of International Relations has five phases for peer-reviewing:

Articles sent to the Journal first pass through the general evaluation of the Managing Editors. Articles that cannot pass the first evaluation (“Editor’s Cut”) are rejected. Rejection reasons include the article’s content is out of area for the Journal, it does not comply with the ethical considerations and/or principles of the Journal, it does not follow the author guidelines, it is not qualified for  publication, the number of the articles received by the Journal is too high to evaluate within a reasonable time, etc. 

Articles that pass the first phase, are assigned to an Associate Editor to have a detailed assessment. At this stage, the rejection reasons may include that the article’s content is beyond the scope of the journal, that it does not comply with the ethical considerations and/or principles of the Journal, that it does not follow the author guidelines, that it is not qualified to be published, etc.

Articles that pass from the assessment of the Associate Editors, are sent to two experts on the related topic for peer-review. While designating the reviewers, all Editors and the Editorial Board are asked for their opinions. In cases where referee reports are contradictory or are not found sufficient, a third referee is asked to review the work. The articles that are not considered sufficient by both reviewers are rejected.

Those articles that are evaluated as “review and re-submit”, will be sent to the same reviewers for re-evaluation when a corrected version is received. At this stage, the articles are rejected if they are not found sufficient by the reviewers.

Articles that successfully pass the peer-review process move into the final stage, where a final check by the Managing Editors for accuracy, corrections, language editing, reference checking are implemented. All the papers that clear this stage are forwarded to the Editorial Board for the final decision. Although positive reviewer reports and Managing Editors’ recommendations are taken into consideration, the Board’s considerations are broad based, and its decisions are final.

Articles that receive approval from the Editorial Board for publication, are published online promptly, after design process, as 'Online First’, and are, at a later date, assigned an issue.

In line with this policy, the journal does not issue acceptance letters for any reason prior to the final decision by the Editorial Board.